As someone who has only recently come to an awareness of Reformation Day itself, I have been asking the question "why should I celebrate it?" (at the same time as being thankful for a natural diversion from the utter pointlessness of Halloween).
It has prompted me to go over some old notes, and what follows includes extracts from an essay I wrote during FP. The title was '"Erasmus laid the egg which Luther hatched" - with this quote in mind assess and compare the contributions of both men to the 16th Century Reformation.' It was set by Ray Lowe (Biggin Hill, Kent) who brought the subject to life in his lectures. I hope that these will serve others like me, who need reminding of what happened (even if it is in very broad brush strokes), and of the huge change which the church is capable of.
Reformation's Impact
The effects of the 16th Century Reformation are beyond measurable. There is no way we can underestimate the lasting effect it has had on the global church. Christ’s bride has become more like Him as a result of its teachings. It is vital that the modern church remembers this; there are plenty of scholars and learned people today who would try to persuade us that the reformation’s only relevance today is nothing more than the fact that it empowered the people, provoked better education and paved the way for democracy.
Reformation's Story
Erasmus preceded Luther and had sought accuracy. He wanted to refine the existing church, nothing more or less. One of the practices he wished to change was the language churches used in services:
“I wish that the scriptures might be translated into all languages…I long thatHis concern was the practical need to translate scripture and change our practices. By contrast, Luther said
the farm labourer might sing them as he follows his plough, the weaver hum them
to the tune of his shuttle, the traveller beguile the weariness of his journey
with their stories”.
"Others before me attacked the Church, I attack the doctrine of theHe was not willing to watch the church being less than it should be. He realised that there were deep-seated theological problems behind these inadequate Roman Catholic practices.
Church."
But what were these two reacting against? Mainly indulgences and purgatory.
Indulgences were the result of the Catholic separation of original sin, and sins we commit. The belief is that Christ’s death paid for our sinful nature, but any sins we commit need to be paid for separately, in the form of one of the seven means of grace (e.g. mass, penance, sacraments). Any sins left not atoned for had then to be worked out in purgatory (between this life and heaven/hell); this led to prayers for the dead.
However, it was believed that good works and prayers performed by Christians over time, and Jesus’ sinless life made up a treasury which could be called upon by the Church. This resulted in people paying the Church, in order to be “let off” their sins. There were even plenary indulgences which would give total exemption from purgatory; often these were relics (Mary’s milk, a piece of cross etc.). Tetzel is known to have marketed indulgences with the promise that “as the coin in the coffer rings, the soul from purgatory springs!”
As people bought indulgences, they were told that all the proceeds were going to the rebuilding of St Peter’s Basilica, however, only half of it went towards this! The rest lined the pockets of people such as the Archbishop of Mainz and Frederick of Saxony.
So there was a lot to be questioned, and where criticism had started by centering around church practices, Luther moved the discussion onto doctrine.
The 95 Thesis
The Holy Spirit stirred Luther to speak out indulgences. He started to preach against them publicly on Sunday mornings, and then (as was the custom) nailed a thesis to the church door, calling for an academic debate on the subject.
It was called the 95 Thesis, made up of 95 points, but with two major themes throughout. The first theme was that repentance in an inward thing, and since indulgences have no inward value, they are not valid. The second stated that the Pope’s power is limited only to Earth – he has no power over the eternal state of man – therefore (again) indulgences have no spiritual value.
Unbeknown to Luther, his thesis was translated from Latin into German, and (thanks to the printing press) distributed across Europe. Because of this, it quickly became the manifesto for Reformation in the Church.
An Overflow of Consequences
As Tim Challies recently said, in nailing his thesis to his church door, Luther "struck a match, beginning a fire that quickly spread throughout Europe and throughout the world."
What followed was not only radical change in the church, including nation states breaking with Rome but the real fruit being the gospel restored to church life and an emphasis on the need of each individual to understand for themselves the gospel's message and necessity.
What In Our Day?
What I take from this brief overview is thankfulness to God that even though His church was beyond reaching the world with the gospel, He took time to re-engineer it so that it became fit for purpose. He didn't simply give up on it and look for some other people to carry His promises to the ends of the earth. No, He took time to carefully restore His church closer to New Testament principles.
We can expect Him to do the same in our day. As we look for the church to be fully restored we can wait expectantly for God to move and restore us that much closer to His norm. I believe He will do it. I believe He is doing it.
Martin Robinson and Dwight Smith make similar deductions in the opening words of "Invading Secular Space":
"This book begins with some fundamental convictions. First, that theThe church has encountered such radical challenges in the past as the ones we face today. Surely that challenge the Reformation addressed was one of those? But listen to their seventh point: "It is possible for the church to be recast to meet the challenges of this age."
church is called to share in the mission of God. Second, despite its
weakness and manifest failures the church continues to occupy a central position
in the intention of God for His world. Third, that the church in the
Western world finds itself in deep crisis. Fourth, that however profound
that crisis might be, the church is called to rediscover its life and
witness. Fifth, that the re-imaging of the church can only take place
around the centrality of its call to mission. Sixth, the church
has encountered such radical challenges in the past. Seventh,
that it is possible for the church to be recast to meet the challenges
of our age, and that even now signs of the future church can be
detected with eyes to see."
Hear that? It is possible. We will see the Church restored, the expression of Christianity changed around the world and God glorified through a glorious, triumphant Church!


