A day for Tories if ever there was one. Not a day for Gordon Brown. In my opinion, he came across as timid and weak, with no real changes to announce, just an hour of pompous self-congratulatory rhetoric.
As an awkward quirk of the system, the Leader of the Opposition only receives a copy of the budget a few minutes before it is announced in the House of Commons. And when they do get a copy, it is with the actual figures blanked out. This means that wheras the Chancellor has months to prepare his hour at the despatch box on budget day, the Leader of the Opposition has no opportunity whatever to make a reply of any substance.
But today this made no difference as Mr Brown managed to squeeze very little substance into the speech; even if David Cameron had had more notice of the document, I can't imagine that you can counter "no-substance" with "substance". Nevertheless David Camreon's reply was excellent, far more engaging than the hour of nonsense spouted by the Chancellor.
In a carbon-conscious world we have a fossil-fuel Chancellor, we heard. He is stuck in the past and correctly characterised by the Opposition as an old fashioned "tax and spend" politician. As DC read out how much Britain will be borrowing over the next few years, it made me think about things from a Christian point of view.
Some Christians think that it doesn't matter how much you borrow, as long as you're helping people with the money. My question is can it ever be right, or (if you want to use this language) even a Godly thing to do, to plunge future generations of Britons into decades of debt for the sake of being able to meet targets? A church wouldn't dream of asking its people to get into debt to fund its social action work, and businesses wouldn't survive on this basis. So why do these people think that it is okay in government? Surely this is appalling stewardship, and David Cameron made this point (from a non-Christian perspective of course), saying that Labour is mortgaging Britain's future.
The characteristic rudeness of the Labour party was highlighted on multiple occasions, first with Jack Straw leaving the frontbench less than a minute into the 8-minute reply and then with DC telling the Prime Minister and Chancellor that it was important that they listen to him, rather than chatting to each other. He was then backed up by the Deputy Speaker who called the speech to a halt to call the entire Labour side to order, telling them to mirror the respect shown to their future leader by the Tories. One Labour MP was even threatened with removal.
It was highlighted that it was highly unlikely that the Chancellor, being the person who has destroyed pensions and blocked reform, could be a suitable person to save pensions and reform public services.
Even the Liberals had a good point to make, highlighting what we now know to be a pre-election bribe in last year's budget. Sir Menzies Campbell asked why pensioners deserved an extra £200 last year, but didn't this year. An insightful question, which I assume will be avoided by Labour at all costs.
Overall though, this was a day for Conservatives everywhere. The Chancellor showed himself to be everything his opponents thought they would need to prove. To quote David Cameron: "He's an analogue politicianin a digital age. Mr Deputy Speaker, he - is - the - past."
VIDEO SERMON by Tope Koleoso on Sin
9 hours ago
